This week has seen the initial launch of ContactPoint, a national database which holds the details of every child in England. The service was conceived in the wake of the Victoria Climbie Inquiry and created under the Children Act 2004, with the intention of making important information about children accessible to at least childcare professionals in all sectors.
However, the service has proved controversial, with critics arguing that ContactPoint raises many questions about safety (the system has already been delayed twice due to security fears) and an individual's right to privacy. Both opposition parties have pledged to scrap the database should they come to power.
What do readers think? Is ContactPoint likely to make the work of childcare professionals easier, with the added benefit of improving child welfare, or is this a further example of the 'Big Brother' society impinging on civil liberties? The case for the new service is made in this Times column, while a Guardian piece entitled Losing Contact argues that it is flawed. You can vote in the poll on the right of this page, or leave a comment in response to this post - here's how.
Home
»
»Unlabelled
» ContactPoint
Recent Posts
Sure Start Children's Centres
The Parliamentary Education Committee has just published a new report about Sure Start Children's Ce[...]
Ofsted & Free Schools
Two days after you write a review of the year (see previous post), two more important reports come o[...]
Poverty and Social Exclusion 2013
The 2013 edition of Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion has just been published. This is an annu[...]
Review of 2013
If it's nearly Christmas, it must be time for a review of major developments and new research publis[...]
Childhood & Education: A Collection of Open Access Journal Articles
I've written on here before about the usefulness of Open Access research (see previous post for deta[...]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Click to see the code!
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.